The Behavior of Banks under the Deposit Insurance and Capital Requirements

نویسنده

  • XIAOZHONG LIANG
چکیده

Compare to other firms, banks are special in three ways. First, most banks are insured by deposit insurance. Second, banking industry is highly regulated. Third, banks are financial intermediary. To attract deposits is one of a bank’s main functions, and deposits compose the most part of a bank’s debt. Among the various regulations, minimum capital requirements play an important role, which require banks to keep their capital-to-asset ratio above a certain amount. Usually the minimum capital requirements are considered as a remedy of the deposit insurance. In banking system, deposit insurance can be purchased from the governmental insurance agency–the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation(FDIC). Although banks are not commanded to join the FDIC, most banks have the membership. In the beginning of the FDIC history, member banks obtained full coverage on deposit at a quite low premium. Later, the effective premium increased while coverage were cut down, however, the premium explicitly paid was still ignorable compared to the big amount of deposit coverage. After risk-based premium system was originally established, 75% banks were in the best-rated category. This percentage of best-rated banks increased to 93% in 2000. These best-rated banks pay no premium for deposit insurance. It should not be surprising if banks take advantage of this ”generous” insurance system. According to moral hazard theory, an insurant tends to be less careful about their risky behavior since he can leave the loss to the insurer. This moral hazard behavior is often seen especially when insurance is not correctly priced. Under the protection of the FDIC, banks have incentive to take deposits as much as they can for some debt-favor reasons such as tax deduction on interest payment, and let the FDIC pay for the deposits if it turns out banks do not have enough capital to pay the deposits back. As a matter of fact, the average bank capital ratio had decreased from 13% to 6% during the first decade after deposit insurance became effective. However, the capital ratio had begun to fall steadily from more than 50% since 1840, long time before the FDIC was established. This casts some doubts on the criticism of the deposit insurance. 1970s witnessed another mild decrease in capital ratio of banks in the U.S. Meanwhile, the number of failed banks rose slightly. In 1981 the regulator, for the first time, implemented explicit capital requirements in hope of preventing bank crisis. They required all the

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bank Capital Requirements and the Riskiness of Banks: A Review

Banks are required to hold capital primarily as a buffer against future losses and in order to reduce the exposure of the deposit insurer. However, as regulators and researchers have recognized, changes in capital requirements also affect bank portfolio behavior. It is possible that increased capital requirements may lead banks to increase their riskiness and thus increase their expected losses...

متن کامل

Do Bank Risk Management and Regulatory Policy Reduce Risk in Banking?∗

This paper addresses the impact of dynamic risk management on bank risk taking. We show that when banks earn rents only from deposit insurance and can engage in risk management it is no longer in their interests to maximize risk; instead, they moderate their risk to increase their chances of survival. The paper also shows that the opportunity for risk management may change the impact of capital...

متن کامل

Does Corporate Governance Matter in Deposit Insurance? DI and Moral Hazard in Joint Stock and Mutual Financial Intermediaries

In this paper, we analyze the differences of effects of a deposit insurance schemes on financial cooperative and joint stock banks risk taking. We develop a methodology which includes the specifics of the utility function for the financial cooperative and we compare the results to a similar profit maximizing joint stock bank. We find that the introduction of deposit insurance does in fact incre...

متن کامل

State-Contingent Bank Regulation With Unobserved Action and Unobserved Characteristics

This paper studies bank regulation in the presence of deposit insurance, where banks have private information on their own ability and their investment strategy. Banks choose the mean and variance of their portfolio return. Regulators wish to control banks’ risk choice, even though all agents are risk neutral and there are no deadweight costs of bank failure, because high risk adversely affects...

متن کامل

The Pre-Commitment Approach in a Model of Regulatory Banking Capital

T he pre-commitment approach to bank capital regulation is a radical departure from existing bank regulatory methods. First proposed in Kupiec and O’Brien (1995c), the approach advocates letting banks choose their capital levels and fining them if losses exceed this level. The essence of the proposal is to use fines (or other penalties) to encourage risky banks to hold more capital than safer o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005